This area I have highlighted could very possibly be a technique known as; “Sandbagging”.

Latin, Central & Columbian drug cartel.
They use sandbags on either side of the head & neck.


A unique way to give someone a head concussion, light closed head injury; without leaving an external bruise.


To effectively fracture of the cervical vertebrae.
This technique can in fact, if performed by an experienced individual, not result in either the severing of the spinal-cord and/or fracturing of the brainstem. Whilst keeping the victim alive for further torture.

It is entirely plausible that this injury highlighted could be in fact a botched attempt at this torture technique.

#Miss Pajama Girl
© 2014


CLUE #1 Murder of Travis Alexander

CLUE #1 Murder of Travis Alexander

Why is it that the Office of the Medical Examiner, in Maricopa County, Arizona…delay performing the autopsy on Travis Alexander for a week? Instead, they placed Travis Alexander in a medical refrigerated storage unit.

Why? You should be asking yourselves this very question.


* Compare pictures taken of the deceased Travis Alexander by Police after the reporting of
the discovery of his body.

- pay attention to the colour of his skin – pinkish.
- pay attention to the texture of his skin.
- pay close attention to the rate of decomposition of skin and muscle tissue – very little.

* Compare pictures taken of Travis Alexander at the Office of the Medical Examiner,
County of Maricopa, Arizona.

- notice the colour of his skin – grey.
- notice the texture of his skin.
- notice the very apparent advanced rate of decomposition, typically seen when a dead
body is stored in a medical refrigerated unit, for more than 5 days.

Ask yourselves WHY?

© Miss Pajama Girl 2014






I have created a team of experts and have individuals with sub-area specialties to examine ALL area’s of the
Murder of Travis Alexander.
The Total and complete exoneration through solid fact based evidence proving that Jodi Arias had no involvement in the kidnapping, torture and murder of Travis Alexander.
Through the investigation, examination of ALL facts, persons and leads. The murder of Travis Alexander shall be solved.
Bringing to Justice the real Murderers of Travis Alexander.



In Life we have countless experiences, encounter a multitude of situations and all types of people.

We are All a part of humanity.

Each individual person has their own personal ideas and their interpretation of those ideas.
We are the sum of our life’s experiences.

As Jesus said, to fully understand what it is like to be another person, we must walk a mile in their sandals.

We all know this to be impossible and that is the major part of the message given. We might try to understand what another person experiences, however try as we will it cannot be done.

The world has always had its degrees of violence, jealousy, cruelty and pettiness.
With that being said; we live in a time of our world where humanity is connected to each other spanning across the globe with the ease made possible by Multimedia in the Internet.
Should it not be that since in the past, we as humans suffered from ignorance and understanding of other cultures, people’s, religions, lifestyles and education about sickness, disease and suffering. That we should be able to gain insight and a better understanding of each other.

Logically one would assume that with the global community connected so easily that the walls of prejudice, stereotyping and a lack of knowledge on issues that affect humanity and with this, one would assume that humanity would become more learned, understanding and compassionate to each other, when the claim of not knowing what was going on cannot be used because that ignorance no longer exists.

However, there is a new type of ignorance, one of purposeful intent.
The rate of aggressive behaviour towards a total and complete stranger simply because they do not share your opinion is increasing at an alarming rate. What motivates individuals to attack those whom they disagree with? This is not simplly a respectful discussion of people debating issues civilly. These behaviours are full of malice, cruelty mixed with a sadidistic leaning towards the obsessive.

To purposely attack a person or group simply because theirs do not coincide with yours is unacceptable!

If society does not proactively work towards the abolishment of such abusive thinking and behaviour, society will find itself pulled apart from within, degraded to the point of a tribal like warfare connected with countless cell groups who’ve unified under the guise of self appointed vigilantism, feeling justified to ratify not only the thinking of those who hold viewpoints counter to theirs, but also the organised destruction of the lives those people live. This may or may not include the ultimate radical ending of physical death, but it does enter into the realm of destroying the lives those people lead, alienating them from the social system itself.

Society is currently in a very pivotal point in its social evolution. We are seeing first hand the example that Emile Durkheim gave of, “Survival of the Fittest”. Now he was referring to the animal kingdoms, not the “human animal”. Several groups are defining themselves.

1. Aggressive Modivators
2. Aggressive Enforcers
3. Aggressive Maintainers

4. Passive Motivators
5. Passive Maintainers

Group (B) has no enforcers because they do not approach their debating of their views with aggression.

6. Aggressive Retaliators – members of Group (A)
7. Overly Aggressive Retaliators. – members of Group (B)

In Group (C), #6 & 7 are end result of this pattern.

#6 is acting out because they have not gained the control over others they had intended and so they retaliate in frustration, resorting to intimidation techniques, subterfuge and anything they can use that will accomplish their goals of either swaying the thinking of those who think contrary to them or destroying their spirit, break their morale until they simply fade away into the background, not to be heard or seen of again.

#7 is retaliating out of sheer desperation and frustration, having been pushed to their limit of just how much they could take, until they could take no more and move into the range of violence and unpredictable disorganised behaviour. The aggressors, Group (A), who have worked so hard at degragrading, humiliating, and alienating a person or group of people, now have to face open revolution. Group (B) Coming swiftly, violently and without mercy. Why would mercy be given when their aggressors not once showed any to them.

Historic examples relating to this are:

- The rising up of the people of India during the Victorian Era and the slaughter of every
man, woman and child.
- Slave Insurrections during the French Revolution. (Islands)
- French Revolution.
- Russian Revolution.
- American Civil War
- Lybia’s revolution & the overthrowing of Muammar Gaddafi.
- Egypt’s ongoing revolution.
- Syria’s ongoing revolution.

Smaller examples:

- Columbine, Colorado shooting.
- Aurora, Colorado shooting in a movie theatre.
- Blackville, South Caroline
- Craighead County, Arkansas
- Santee, California

These are but a few examples.

In closing I leave you with this. There is no excuse for bullying, using acts of intimidation against a person or group. Humanity should be using the gift of technology to reach out to other people’s across the globe and learn about other ways of life, respect the opinions of others. Have we not seen the mistakes made in the past by great and powerful nations, come into a new land / territory and force their religion and views upon people simply because they had the power to intimidate and make threats of what they would do if the peoples did not acquiesce and back up those threats with actions.

Will or can humanity ever change? Or do they simply enjoy the power of degrading another to simply esteem themselves with an illogical sense of greater self-worth than those they do not agree with?

© Miss Pajama Girl 2014


Due to the high volume of questions by Jodi Arias supporters, that have been sent my way regarding this case.

I am considering creating a discussion forum for, Jodi Arias Supporters, who can gather together, review the Forensic Analysis provided by myself, Miss Pajama Girl & Associates.

The discussion forum would have the following set up.
- Main moderators
- Prior approval to join the discussion forum. (We all know how many haters of Jodi there are).
- Different topics for discussion.
- Suggestions for topics welcomed.
- Sub-Area Moderators to be present & active in discussions.
* These positions are open for volunteering, upon my own personal approval.

Special Guest Appearances by my Associates on specific discussions

Please let me know if this interests you.

Miss Pajama Girl

© MissPajamaGirl 2014

PART – 4 Secondary Forensic Review by Additional Forensic Experts

Secondary Forensic Report

Travis Alexander

Never in my career have I seen such gross misconduct of evidentiary procedure by the County of Maricopa, Arizona,  the investigating police and office of the medical examiner.

Upon investigating this case and the questionable evidence submiitted by the authorities above I shall outline the most obvious inconsistencies.

This Follow up review has been prompted by the additional consultation with two other Forensic specialists.

Reference to previously used photos in my prior reports Part 2 and 3.



* Evidence on pictures that has been photos taken by the M.E

- look at the colour change between the bodies.
- picture #13 the colour of  the body is closer to the colour of  a body that had been only dead for no more than 24 hours vs. the picture #21.

Other Inconsistencies:

* Suffocation torture and revival after torture.

* Lack of swollen tongue and eyes.

- proof of age of decomposition max 24 hours.

* Illogical blood splatter pattern.

- deposited deliberately
- blood should be everywhere, including ceiling in front of bathroom sink.

* A .25 caliber gun can only penetrate the cranium when placed behind the ear, angled upward towards brain. This is where the cranial bone is thinnest.

- any other area of the cranium the bullet would not penetrate.

* The breaking of the neck was ritualistic.

- the neck was broken before the throat was slit to minimize blood splatter at their own scene where the kidnapping and ritualistic torture and murder occurred.
- blood was collected post-mortem. Easier for the re-depositing of blood at the staged crime scene.

* Slitting of the throat ritualistic.
- cut by a right handed person from in front of victim.

Jewish Ritual of Sacrifice

Kosher Law: Animal’s throat slit, placed in an environment where no bugs can infest, Hung upside down for drainage & collection.


Not a single bug or bug larvae is reported by the police, forensics team and M.E This is completely illogical for a corpse to have been sitting in his domicile, presence of a dog indoors who goes in and out to the bathroom and humans moving in and out of building.

- Travis Alexander was not killed in his home.
-  His body would have after his murder, to be placed in an airtight container for transport to his home for the staging of the crime.


Every police officer, forensics team member and medical examiners can easily see how this specific case has Never followed the correct PROCEDURE for a crime.

It was as though everyone was acting as like they were doing their jobs. However when examined, it is clear through their prior case records that neither police, forensics team or medical examiner’s office performed their duties as they normally had on any other prior cases and cases thereafter.

Why did the Office of the Medical Examiner not do the following?

- 90% of photos are not taken at the office of the M.E, but at the scene.
- All angles should be represented of the corpse. They were not.
- Where is the video of the crime scene?
- Where is the video of the various autopsy steps? Is there one?
- Many photos are not in focus and poor lighting.
- A fill in of half of the sharp force object cuts with mortician’s putty?
Look at pictures #22, 23, 24 and 25.

Right Hand of Travis Alexander

* Pictures taken at different stages of decomposition.

- M.E states on page 4 that only the left hand has received what appear to be defensive wounds from a sharp force object.
- Normally defensive wounds are sustained bilaterally, (on both sides).

Why are half of the photos submitted by the state in different stages of decomposition of the victim?

Was this an attempt to exaggerate the decomposition and overwhelm a jury with graphic photo’s, having them overlook the different shades and texture of the victim because the M.E has stored the body and taken photo’s at different latter periods of decomposition, while the body is stored in a refrigerated storage unit at the M,E office?

Did the M.E deliberately allow the corpse of Travis Alexander to be aged under controlled conditions so that the pictures taken by them would match the story the State of Arizona has created and to use in their prosecution of the crime?

The right hand shows no evidence of any defensive wounds. This is completely contrary to what happens to victims who are attacked by an assailant with a sharp force object.

- Both the right and left hands, wrists and arms should be cut with defensive wounds, yet they are not.

Bathroom – Blood Splatter Pattern

I have never seen such a “Lack of blood splatter”, at a crime scene. There should have been blood splatter and spraying All in front of the sink due to the alleged slitting of the throat. Spraying should have hit the mirror, the ceiling and All over the floor. The faucets should have blood in the crevice where the faucet joins with the sink/counter top.
There is just enough blood for someone to take notice.
A victim who is being actively pursued will not be leaning over the sink with his hands almost squarely positioned.

This is not the original crime scene.

This is a deliberately positioned crime scene that took time and calculation to methodically deposit blood and the body for detection. Carried out by no less than two people for the transport of the heavy and muscular body of Travis Alexander and the deposit of him in a small space properly, without leaving any normal DNA trace.

- grout which soaks up stains easily is free of blood residue.
- soap and hair gel containers clean of any residue.
- the little statue on counter top was clear of any residue.
- toothbrush: which easily retains dirt and stains is lacking.


A) - shows entrance of a projectile entering into the upper part of the forehead on the right side of cranium, above brow.

B) - damage to right side of frontal lobe of brain matter, causing a circular

C) - no line from the entrance of the projectile to inside lower cheek- upper jaw
area of molars.

D) - injury to the area of lower cheek, upper jaw- molar area.
This is what is shown on the X-Ray submitted M.E. A bullet is viewed lodged.

The M.E states that a projectile re-entered the left cheek.
- Why did the M.E not provide an X-Ray showing the left side of Cranium and face?

The X-Ray provided by the M.E suggests that either:

A - the projectile entered into the nasal cavity and performed a U-Turn without causing any significant life threatening damage to the victim.
Then lodged itself in the lower right cheek, which is shown only on an X-Ray
of the right side of the cranium and face of victim.

B - that a projectile entered into the victims lower part of the anterolateral forehead, above the brow and mysteriously re-enters the left cheek, with no sign of the path the projectile took through the brain, cranium and into left cheek.

C - the possibility of two projectiles used. (NOT A BULLET).

D - the .25 caliber fired bullet shown in the X-Ray was simply placed in the area for the     X-Ray evidence.

I do not believe that a .25 caliber bullet was shot into the hardest and strongest area of the human cranium, which a .25 caliber is unable to penetrate into.

- this is the area of the head that soccer players use to butt the ball with.
- if this was such a soft area of the cranium, it would not be used for butting a soccer ball with.


- there is no gun powder stippling or gun powder residue found on the corpse.
- this proves that Travis Alexander was not shot by a gun of any type.

As the M.E explains, a .25 caliber gun was shot from a distance of no less than 2.5 feet. If this had been the case, then the bullet would have glanced off the side of Travis Alexander’s skull.


- M.E states on pg. #7 of his report that the cervical spine area is structurally intact.
- The hyoid bone and thyroid cartilage is intact.
- No demonstrated hemorrhagic signs.
- Strap and soft tissues of neck are intact.
- The upper airway is traumatized, but intact and patent.

PATENT: Easily recognizable.

The M.E was extremely careful in how this part of the report was worded.

Pictures taken by the Police department, used by the M.E and state, show the body identified as Travis Alexander. Found lying in his shower at his home of residence. The body is positioned at an angle that clearly shows the man’s neck has been broken quite violently. Yet in the M.E report and X-Rays show the contrary.
There is no doubt in my mind, nor that of the 2 other forensic experts consulted with on this case; that the neck of Travis Alexander was indeed broken. As per photo evidence submitted by the M.E and Office of the Prosecutor for the State of Arizona.

The odd bulge shown in M.E photo #29 shows an odd bulge on the posterior side. This is evidence of the neck being broken violently by an inexperienced person(s).

Attempting to fracture a human’s neck is not as easy as portrayed in the media. Pressure would have been placed by a knee on either the side of his head or neck and an additional knee on the shoulder. Because of the size of the victim and his neck, the person(s) breaking the neck of Travis Alexander would of had to of had exceptional upper body and arm strength, with isolated aid to the different half’s of his body for isolation to occur for fracturing of neck, due to his strong muscular neck muscles.
- two people are need for this to occur on victim.


When referring to pages in M.E report. I am referring to the Medical Examiner for the County of Maricopa, Arizona. Dr. Kevin D. Horn. M.D

- page 3 of M.E report states that the cut is minimal
- look at pg. 1 of M.E report.

The M.E states on the report that the neck muscles were not damaged. This is a contradiction of latter evidence photo’s submitted and formal M.E report. He testified to as follows:

1. The upper airway was traumatized, yet intact.
2. Strap muscles, soft tissue muscles in neck are intact.
3. Thyroid intact.

If Travis Alexander had his throat slit, as demonstrated in the latter picture. Then he would not have had any three of these items intact.

Look very closely at the pictures side by side and see how small the actual depth of the wound into his neck is.

Look again very closely and compare the space between the cut and the ear in the left photo and then the right photo. The cut has been enlarged on each side approximately 1.5 inches.

The neck of Travis Alexander was cut by the Medical Examiner with a medical dremel. The neck was then opened and pulled back and the subsequent photos used in the trial against Jodi Arias, exaggerating and falsely portraying the non-fatal wound on the neck.


These two last pieces of evidence was thought over very carefully, discussing them at great length with the other forensic experts.

The following statement is not made lightly.

In fact the seriousness of this piece of the evidence is part of the State of Arizona’s formal evidence they have submitted themselves into the case.

Let us examine this last piece of evidence with careful thought.


Look at picture #32
X-Ray of right side of skull and face.

It appears that two holes have been made post-mortem.

- an instrument has been inserted up into the cranium, into the frontal lobe
of the brain to remove a circular piece of the brain.

- filled in so that it would cover up the deliberate removal of brain matter.

This was performed to alter the remains of Travis Alexander so that it would show that a projectile had entered into the cranium.

The hole alleged by the M.E in fact is not caused by a projectile, but made post mortem by either a medical instrument or a stiletto.

If indeed Mr. Alexander had been shot by a projectile, he would have been killed.
Even with such an alleged wound, the rate of decomposition alleged by the M.E does not fit with the early photos provided by the M.E office.

Post mortem face of Travis Alexander

Finally I leave you with Picture #33.

Upon re-examining the evidence, this last piece has come to attention.

Pay close attention to the areas A, B and C.

A    Alleged Bullet Hole:

- NO
- this has been exacted by either a medical instrument or   stiletto.

B   Hole under right eyebrow:
- covered up by mortician’s putty

C  Hole in upper left hand corner of eye, Para mid-line right of   nose.
- this has been covered up with a small piece of foil.

These two small holes have been created for the express purpose of creating a hole within the brain to remove the small amount of brain matter in the alleged area where the projectile entered. Because a projectile did not enter into the cranium, above the right eyebrow of Travis Alexander. This was created to make appear that an independent free flowing projectile had.

I challenge any other professional in the field of Forensic Pathology to examine these findings. I welcome your input, even if to the contrary.

Pictures Below #23, 21-33


© MissPajamaGirl 2014